Book Review — All the President's Men


All the President's Men offers a compelling description of Woodward and Bernsteins investigative journalism but suffers from a narrow presentation of the events surrounding Watergate and its exposure.

This is a posting of an old review I did ( for this book but never published here.

While the main focus of All the President's Men is invariably was on Woodward and Bernstein and their attempts to uncover the larger secretes surrounding Watergate, the story at times had too many players and there was a paucity of big picture views to help glue everything together.

Removing Watergate, this book provided a pretty vivid descriptions of the lengths that reporters might need to go to get a story or find out sources. The descriptions of Deep Throat's (i.e. Mark Felt) involvement were interesting in illuminating the paranoia at the time and the methods employed to keep sources safe. This is somewhat in contrast to their attempts to gain access to the grand jury during one of the trials and their extreme luck at not being reprimanded by Judge Sirica.

A slightly larger bit of history about reporting tactics would also have helped when judging the actions of various journalists described in the book, especially some of the more questionable ways they derived answers from sources. For example, there is a scene where they are talking to a lawyer of a source then plan to publish a piece on and they realize he can't directly give the answer. To get around this, they say he can hang up or stay on the line after they ask the question, and that'll give them the answer. He stays on the line and they interpret that as validating their question, but later on it is revealed that the lawyer was confused and was actually trying to warn them not to run that particular story.

One particular aspect of the book, at least from a reader not immersed in the journalists world, is how easy it actually is to get in contact with people in power. For example, they attempt to get interviews with President Nixon, using the fact that they will give the questions to be asked in advance to hopefully gain access. At another point, there is a phone call with Kissinger in which he becomes rather angry when some of his comments won't be taken off the record, then later calls the Washington Post office and complains to their boss. Maybe having some of the larger-than-life characters appear one dimensional is the point (or they just didn't have enough access or space in the book to flesh them out), but the frantic pace at which the book goes sometimes makes it hard to keep all the sub-stories straight.

In the end, the book would have been slightly better off taking a step back from time-to-time to provide a bit of history about how other situations like this were handled by the media, both the public facing (what was published) and investigative sides. This would have helped make the events unfolding appear all the more incredible given what had come before. As it is, it is a good description of the various players involved, how people responded to the continual revelation that Watergate involved more people than originally thought, and the still crazy idea that the President could be black-mailed and corrupted to such a degree.

bahanonu [at]

additional articles to journey through:

book review: capital in the twenty-first century
29 july 2015 | books

A flawed and deceitful rant against free markets in the guise of an objective analysis about the dynamics of capital. Piketty focuses almos[...]t exclusively on the inequality of wealth/capital and its accumulation. He then spends vast portions of the book attempting to put this inequality in a bad light without clearly articulating why. Couple that with a tendency to qualify every claim so as to avoid taking a definitive stand and you have a book that leaves you more confused and less informed about the topic, the dynamics of capital, than you entered with.

I'll update this review as I continue to chew over the book's many claims/assertions.

archive everything!
01 october 2012 | notes

Archived everything in my inbox. It's awesome. Continues my general trend of simplifying. Logging off websites, only checking the news for [...]brief periods, and focusing on a core set of hobbies. Eliminating distractions and reducing information overload are doing wonders to fight off stress and keep me humming along.

citizenship, war and social networks
09 september 2012 | essay

Scott Adams recently wrote about citizenship and how the Internet [...]will bring the fall of territory-based national governments, and by extension wars. In this post I briefly highlight where he errs and give reasons why country divides will only grow sharper in the coming decades, in part due to competition for dwindling water, oil and other resources along with increasingly fraught intranational civil relations.

bio42: notes
12 may 2013 | teaching

<p>While teaching bio42 (cell biology and animal physiology) I created weekly notes to help students in my section study [...]and focus on the important materials presented in the class. I built off of the latex boilerplate that I have been improving over time to create weekly notes. This highlights why I love <a href='' target='_blank'>LaTeX</a> so much, especially for larger projects that are heavily linked&mdash;it allows easy annotation, indexing, creation of new document styles, and other related processes rapidly and consistently. Plus, separating content and style is always a plus and images stay uncoupled from a propriety source (e.g. Word files). </p> <p>I really love the resulting notes and student feedback was quite positive. I thought sharing them might be useful for others in the future. The source latex files and raw images can be sent upon request (I'm considering making a Github repository in the future). I'll briefly talk about the document below and certain decisions that were made to get it to its current state. </p>
©2006-2018 | biafra ahanonu | updated 31 january 2018
biafra ahanonu