Why we need more James Polks

Summary

James J. Polk expanded the territory of the United States by about one-third during his tenure. A remarkable feat. Not only that, but it was done through an astonishing three ways: territorial conquest, gold and negotiation.

Some thoughts on why we should demand less rhetoric and more pragmatism/details from our presidents.

James J. Polk expanded the territory of the United States by about one-third during his tenure. A remarkable feat. Not only that, but it was done through an astonishing three ways: territorial conquest, gold and negotiation. And he did that after clearing setting out, before taking office, a set of objectives: reestablish the Independent Treasury System, reduce tariffs, acquire some or all of Oregon Country, and acquire California and New Mexico from Mexico. He accomplished each one.

Perhaps more than most presidents today, Polk was singularly devoted to the job. He personally organized the war and other aspects of the country. While he had multiple reasons for only running once, his ability to set a clear agenda at the beginning and achieve all of it by the end is something to be lauded.

Many presidents today enter the office without a couple of distinct objectives: they often have a vague notion of what they should do and their articulation to the public is equally obscure. This can be seen in the lofty rhetoric used and resorting to generalities rather than specific programs or policies. There is the normal 'I will increase jobs' or 'strengthen national security', but rarely the more useful 'The Highway Trust Fund will be ameliorated' or 'The Army Corps of Engineers will be reviewed'.

When was the last time a president focused on soil and the massive degradation to this essential resource occurring throughout the country? The increased acidity of the oceans and implications for both biodiversity and food supply? How often is the enormous waste of water and the various inter-state battles that will be fought in the coming years (e.g. Arizona v. California)? Where are the specific details, the mention of actual programs?

The runaway rhetoric, partisanship and dogma that have prevailed must be put on a leash. It is not just wishful thinking, but essential that we move toward a pragmatic government. This occurs all the time at many levels of government, such as Metropolitan Transportation Plans, but there is a need for national leadership to make some initiatives happen. Creating an infrastructure bank to help fund initiatives like Measure R (Los Angeles's way of funding its Metro Rail system) would do wonders to help prepare us for the post-oil era. Launching a single, well-designed, public website that helps shine light on crucial, unsexy issues facing the country and resources to educate and guide citizens to action are sorely lacking. Less rhetoric, more action. We need more engineers and scientists in office.

Ron Paul has the right idea, the Tea Party had begun to shine light on the tough questions, but there is a crucial aspect that goes missing. Government, by itself, is not inherently evil or good. It should serve one purpose: fund projects that benefit no single person or entity but which will improve the country as a whole. We need leaders with vision, but more importantly, ones who can also tell us the details. Because without the details, we might as well be voting to give someone a blank check.

-biafra
bahanonu [at] alum.mit.edu

more articles to enjoy:

2016 presidential election campaign posters
28 august 2016 | politics

A series of posters about the 2016 presidential election. They will focus on the candidates themselves along with how the public reacts to,[...] and is manipulated by, the election as a whole.

Is Freedom Necessary? — Poster #1
31 December 2016 | designs

Challenge ideas and assumptions now: be better prepared to defend them in the future. A worthwhile read: [...].net/bnw-revisited/">https://www.huxley.net/bnw-revisited/.

This poster is the first in a series of posters that will explore the relationship between freedom (liberty/license) and various ills plaguing society. It ultimately aims to get people thinking about calls to limit freedom, the context in which these calls arise, and what that means when taken to the extreme.

https://twitter.com/syscarut/status/815047192494804992 #IsFreedomNecessary

reading list and book mini-reviews
21 may 2014 | books

Below is the current crop of books I'm reading along with ratings and mini-reviews for other novels I've recently finished. I'm always exci[...]ted to start a new book, so recommendations are welcome!

NOTE! The ratings are a combination of how impactful the book was on my thinking about a particular topic or how well I think it was written/got its point across. Thus, at times whether I agree or disagree with the content/thesis/etc. of the book, it could still get 5 stars if the point it makes gets me to think about the subject in a new way or changes how I interpret the world around me.

on the subject of something: reviving an old website
12 may 2015 | website

On the Subject of Something was my original blog during high-school and early college. My Opera (the site it was hosted on) closed down and[...] I was unaware of this fact during the grace period during which they allowed users to export the content from their website. However, I am extremely grateful to the Internet Archive: Wayback Machine, which allowed me to recover many of the webpages. I've included links to all the relevant posts that I could recover. Enjoy!

©2006-2025 | Site created & coded by Biafra Ahanonu | Updated 21 October 2024
biafra ahanonu